<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic LUMIX DMC-GF1 &#8212; Mavromatic&#8217;s 2009 Holiday Gift Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mavromatic.com/2009/11/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g1-2009-holiday-gift-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mavromatic.com/2009/11/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g1-2009-holiday-gift-idea/</link>
	<description>Your source for home automation, home theaters, product reviews, mods, hacks, DIY projects, electronics or anything else I&#039;m into at the moment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:47:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danny Mavromatis</title>
		<link>http://www.mavromatic.com/2009/11/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g1-2009-holiday-gift-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-1959</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Mavromatis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mavromatic.com/?p=1339#comment-1959</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Canon guy myself, but the micro-for-thirds cameras, especially the highly rated CF1, can compete with the Canon&#039;s or Nikon&#039;s.  Check out DPReview&#039;s Review of the CF1... they Highly Recommend it!  (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/PanasonicGF1/)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Canon guy myself, but the micro-for-thirds cameras, especially the highly rated CF1, can compete with the Canon&#8217;s or Nikon&#8217;s.  Check out DPReview&#8217;s Review of the CF1&#8230; they Highly Recommend it!  (<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/PanasonicGF1/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/PanasonicGF1/</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mavromatic.com/2009/11/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g1-2009-holiday-gift-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-1958</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mavromatic.com/?p=1339#comment-1958</guid>
		<description>I had bad experience with Lumix camera (FX-35). Comparing with Canon S60 and IXUS 870IS it has worse picture quality. Sure the FX35 is not the same as CF1. But still ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had bad experience with Lumix camera (FX-35). Comparing with Canon S60 and IXUS 870IS it has worse picture quality. Sure the FX35 is not the same as CF1. But still <img src='http://www.mavromatic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Mavromatis</title>
		<link>http://www.mavromatic.com/2009/11/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g1-2009-holiday-gift-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-1951</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Mavromatis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mavromatic.com/?p=1339#comment-1951</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

Way better suggestion, changed it to the CF1, thanks!

Danny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>Way better suggestion, changed it to the CF1, thanks!</p>
<p>Danny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Smallegan</title>
		<link>http://www.mavromatic.com/2009/11/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g1-2009-holiday-gift-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-1948</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Smallegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mavromatic.com/?p=1339#comment-1948</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d also suggest the GF1 which is very similar, uses the same micro four thirds lens system and is much more compact!

http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-GF1-Four-Thirds-Interchangeable-Aspherical/dp/B002MUAEX4/ref=sr_1_3/179-5902846-8449655?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1258811229&amp;sr=8-3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also suggest the GF1 which is very similar, uses the same micro four thirds lens system and is much more compact!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-GF1-Four-Thirds-Interchangeable-Aspherical/dp/B002MUAEX4/ref=sr_1_3/179-5902846-8449655?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1258811229&amp;sr=8-3" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-GF1-Four-Thirds-Interchangeable-Aspherical/dp/B002MUAEX4/ref=sr_1_3/179-5902846-8449655?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1258811229&amp;sr=8-3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PANASONIC LUMIX DMC-G1 — 2009 Holiday Gift Idea #1 - MAVROMATIC &#124; High technology information</title>
		<link>http://www.mavromatic.com/2009/11/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g1-2009-holiday-gift-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-1947</link>
		<dc:creator>PANASONIC LUMIX DMC-G1 — 2009 Holiday Gift Idea #1 - MAVROMATIC &#124; High technology information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mavromatic.com/?p=1339#comment-1947</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.358 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-17 14:54:13 -->
