mavromatic home

Tuesday, January 23, 2007


Steve Jobs, “Nobody uses Java anymore” — Really?

Related Entries: Cell Phones
icon.jpgTen days ago, Pogue posted an interview he had with Steve Jobs about Flash and Java support on the iPhone. Steve Jobs said, “Java’s not worth building in. Nobody uses Java anymore. It’s this big heavyweight ball and chain.”

Am I the only one that finds this interesting since the format Apple is supporting for HD content is BluRay, which uses Java for all the interactive menus or BD-J discs. He is supporting a next gen format which supports a technology that he claims nobody uses anymore.




 | Digg It



SPONSORED ADVERTISEMENTS






COMMENTS

Posted by Mike D. at January 23, 2007 11:22 AM

“Nobody drives Pintos anymore.”

Would you also intentionally misread that statement and argue that “Yes, there are indeed still Pintos on the road”?

Give it up. You love the Steve and feel woefully inferior to him.

Posted by Danny Mavromatis at January 23, 2007 11:42 AM

Yes, you are correct. Nobody drive Pintos anymore — they explode. BluRay uses Java — which doesn’t cause any deaths.

Posted by Mark Thomas at January 23, 2007 12:26 PM

Nobody at Apple uses Java anymore because they have access to OS X 10.5 (Leopard) and have abandoned Java for the bundled Ruby on Rails!

Posted by Tuig at January 23, 2007 12:39 PM

Well BluRay is a pretty small dot on the radar. But what about approximately 1 billion phones that will sell this year that have Java capabilities? Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Motorola, Samsung, LG, NEC, Sharp have all standardised on J2ME, the mobile Java version to support over the air mobile application download. To not support Java means to alienate thousands of mobile application developers. Heck, even most Windows Mobile devices ship with a J2ME emulator. Not having downloadable app capabilities is the iPhone’s Achilles heal and Jobs knows this. He’s just covering up so people don’t notice this weak spot, but it’s as obvious for anyone with a keen eye as the DRM is flawed in iTunes. All part of the big plan.

Posted by Kevin at January 23, 2007 12:47 PM

When asked about it, Jobs was specifically being asked about Java applets on iPhone, whether they would see Java (or Flash) support in iPhone’s web browser. Naturally, his comment should only be interpreted to how it applies to Safari on the iPhone, not his overall view of the technology.

BluRay is irrelevant. This post is pointless.

Posted by Shan at January 23, 2007 12:56 PM

I have to agree with Kevin… The comment was relative to Java applets on websites, not Java as a technology. I think Adobe would be annoyed if they were considered “nobody” for using Java for ColdFusion, JRun, Flash Media Server and Flash Data Services.

Posted by Danny Mavromatis at January 23, 2007 3:16 PM

Kevin,

I understand how he meant it to be interpreted, however, when someone like Jobs makes a blanket statement like this, it can effect peoples perception of a technology. I’m not a fan of BluRay or Java, however, Java is still being used today.

Do you think Java support as in J2ME will be included in the iPhone?

Danny

Posted by Robert M. Hall at January 23, 2007 7:50 PM

Hey Danny,

I put up a post about this recently also. I feel the same way you do, in that Jobs made a response which he didn’t qualify (and easily could have), and individuals following that conversation who are not so enlightened as to know the subtleties of a java applet in a browser versus an entire language/framework for an entire device - their assumption might be that Java wouldn’t be on the phone at all, and Java must be dead and is yesterdays news since “Jobs said so”.

I also felt that Markoff and Pogue could have done a better job in their interviews by taking Jobs to task on some of these answers, if at least just to qualify the responses for the readers of their columns/blogs, etc.

Just my two cents. - Rob

Posted by Willi at February 16, 2007 1:50 PM

What’s Java?

Posted by James at February 20, 2007 11:12 AM

My dog’s name is Java.



Post a comment












Remember personal info?




Comment Preview

Posted by:  on August 29, 2008 12:29:37 AM





Google

Web Site



ADVERTISEMENTS






CREDITS

Powered by MT 3.33.