mavromatic home

Wednesday, July 23, 2008


HAI: Home Automation Interface Software PREVIEW #4

Related Entries: Home Automation
It’s been a while since I have given an update on the progress. The interface is completely tied into the .NET code. It has been running perfectly on a Nobu Embedded Window XP touchscreen for a couple weeks with no issues — no memory leaks — no performance issues at all! I’ve got a name and website URL, I just need to spend some time designing the site. I also have the licensing key system/server ready to go. So what’s left is figuring out a fair price for the software and some legal work. I will be offering a trial version for those that want to test out before you buy.

I’d love to know what you guys think “fair” pricing is… I want to keep it at a price point that every HAI install has my UI software running. I’m also looking into offering a bundled UI/Touchscreen that’s “certified” to run my software. Trouble is keeping costs reasonable.

I will be posting a video demo and launching the website (with product name) in the next few weeks. Cheers!

Here is a screenshot of the climate status panel:


This screenshot is of the controls panels:
grouse-interface_preview_7_sm.jpg


The UI response is pretty much instant (if on a wired network). If you’re using wireless, it’s only as good as your connection link.




 | Digg It



SPONSORED ADVERTISEMENTS






COMMENTS

Posted by Peter at July 23, 2008 12:35 PM

Danny the UI is looking great. I’m going to buy a Nobu and get your software installed on it! Other commercial software products which don’t look half as good and come less features are charging $599. I think you should offer a discount to Mavromatic readers. Don’t under-sell yourself!

Posted by Shawn at July 23, 2008 4:38 PM

That’s a tough one. Those of us who have gone the HAI route probably went that way because we don’t have the bank account of a typical Creston-type user. I certainly think a trial is critical. If I can get it to do what I want (now, and future) and it’s sei-customizable, I’d love to buy after the test-drive. What about a pay-per-function scheme similar to CQC?

Posted by Danny Mavromatis at July 23, 2008 5:58 PM

Shawn,

That’s the challenge… keeping the DIY’er happy and the custom installer happy as well. A typically HAI system can run in the tens of thousands when all said and done… so a few hundred dollars for a great UI with minimal configurations is worth the price.

I’m positioning my application as a premium product since there is no other application that looks and feels like what I’ve built. I took a lot of time to build this for usability and performance.

Other applications like CQC and Snaplink are great, but rely on the end user to create a rich UI. I took the iPhone/Apple approach, where I designed the application to function and look great… with enhancements/updates to come out in time. My other product will be a higher price point aimed at high-end custom installers where they want more control and options to customize.

Posted by Shawn Harper at July 23, 2008 9:30 PM

I like that approach Danny - having a “DIYer” version and a “custom installer” version. And the “few hundred dollars” or less, was the range I was silently hoping for.

P.S. My touchscreen is a Fujitsu 3400 that I got off eBay for $100, so the Nobu, at ~$2800, is not in my ballpark. Too much month at the end of the money for me to play with those kind of toys… But, I DO understand you have to run a business.

Posted by trevor at July 24, 2008 7:48 PM

Will your software run on a OmniLT ? its beautiful looking software, i hope you include us poor $ OmniLT users.

Posted by Danny Mavromatis at July 24, 2008 9:38 PM

Trevor,

That has been a real interesting challenge. I can support it however it requires a serial connection to control and all the new capabilities aren’t supported with the LT.

V1, I opted to not support serial, only ethernet… I may include it if I see lots of people needed that support. Sorry :(

Danny

Posted by Aaron at July 25, 2008 2:27 PM

Danny,
Looks great! I love this interface. I’d like to know whether the cameras are analog or IP. I’d be willing to pay a good deal more for IP integration.

Aaron

Posted by krafty at July 27, 2008 3:11 PM

Danny,

Are you planning on porting this to ELK? You did an awesome job, I would really love to see that on my wall!

Posted by Danny at July 28, 2008 5:16 PM

Aaron,

Yes, IP camera support is supported, that is the only method supported in v1. I’ve got a method that loads camera images pretty nicely — I’m using Axis Camera Server and IP cameras in my system.

Krafty,

I would like to support ELK, but at the moment, due to resources I only plan on HAI controllers. If I have great success with the HAI version, ELK will follow.

Thanks,
Danny

Posted by gmanzari at September 20, 2008 3:08 PM

Hey Danny,

The UI looks really good. Congratulations.

Are you working on an iPhone interface for your HAI, like the ControlUI?

Gius



Post a comment












Remember personal info?




Comment Preview

Posted by:  on November 20, 2008 1:11:55 PM





Google

Web Site



ADVERTISEMENTS






CREDITS

Powered by MT 3.33.