![](data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,<svg height="311px" width="400px" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1"/>)
Here’s another preview of my UI software. Things are progressing… my battle right now is, do I support older than 2.16 firmware? Firmware 2.16 adds Omni-Link II which is better, but I don’t want to leave the folks with 2.15 and earlier out (of course they could upgrade their firmware). I support both, but the logic required gets tricky — I’m worried about future updates and how I’ll need to support legacy if I decide to support older firmwares now. What do you guys think?
Performance is pretty good but anytime you add a graphical user interface CPU usage will be higher than boring native UI controls — overall I’m happy with how it’s performing. I will be optimizing some things a bit later to improve things.
I have also received great input from users and I will try to incorporate as much as I can into this product, so keep sending requests and suggestions!! My next product will offer a lot more and will service a higher-end market. All this has spawned from a need for an easy to use, cost effective, great looking interface for my home automation system (HAI based) and from the reactions so far, I think other feel the same! I hope to have an actual trial version as well as a product name soon. More to come!
View Comments (23)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 2 3 Next »This looks awesome. I can't wait to try it out.
This looks awesome. I can't wait to try it out.
This looks awesome. I can't wait to try it out.
Man, that looks so nice! Good job.
Man, that looks so nice! Good job.
Hai.
Hai.
Looking great. Only thing I see missing is a release date. :)
If it complicates things too greatly, I'd say not to support older firmware (like I have). People should be upgrading anyway (like I am). My 2 cents.
Looking great. Only thing I see missing is a release date. :)
If it complicates things too greatly, I'd say not to support older firmware (like I have). People should be upgrading anyway (like I am). My 2 cents.
Danny,
I would strongly suggest against it. People can upgrade easily and should. You don't want to end up like Vista where you're so full of code because you wanted to make it backward compliant for everyone. I would recommend focusing on 2.16 and up and start putting those features in and getting it out. People with lower firmware should upgrade for MANY more reasons than just this UI. If you're making a program for Vista, would you be considering making sure it's Win95 compliant?